Host galaxy subtraction

The goal of the QED Atlas was to construct spectral energy distributions for the continuum emission from the AGN only. To that end, line emission (NLR and BLR) was removed and an attempt was made to subtract the host galaxy starlight contribution. However, no attempt was made to subtract off a far/mid-IR galaxy dust contribution.

The starlight correction is largest near 1 micron, and is small even there for the higher luminosity objects. For the lower luminosity objects, we normalized the starlight component based on published measurements of the host galaxy luminosity where available (rather than fitting the normalization to a multicomponent model of the SED itself as is normally done these days).

The individual quasar SEDs were composed of photometry and spectrophotometry taken in a variety of apertures. A simple spatial model of the host galaxy was used, based on reported half-light radii for each object. Our modified Hubble law is

S(r) = S0 / ( 1 + r/(g*re))^2

with a cutoff at r/re = 5.4. The parameter g is set to 0.093, and re is the half-light radius.

Fig 4. Starlight template used for host galaxy subtraction. Template is shown with energy distribution of PG 1426+015 for comparison, with relative normalization appropriate for the limit of large aperture. Dashed lines illustrate mean IR and X-ray colors of galaxy, not used in subtraction.

Fig 5. Adopted host galaxy luminosities and radii. The solid curve indicates the Bingelli et al (1984) relation. Points marked by open circles are constrained to lie on the curve, while radii for other points are derived using radial profile information as described in the text. The median host galaxy normalization used where specific information is lacking is indicated by the large solid symbol and represents the median of the other points. The well known galaxies M31 and M87 are also plotted on the figure for comparison.

Fig. 6 Host galaxy flux corrections at rest frame H (percent) as a function of absolute visual magnitude. Solid circles indicate corrections made using data on the specific host galaxy, while open circles indicate use of the median normalization. Note that as you move away from the H (1 micron-ish) spectral region the magnitude of the correction quickly becomes much smaller.

Adopted Host Galaxy Parameters

Here we tabulate the estimated H-band nu L(nu) for the host galaxy and the half-light radius in kpc, as used in the host galaxy subtraction calculation.
Object Log L(H)(erg/s) Re (kpc)Ref
Q0003+158 44.60+- 0.30, 0.60 10.000
Q0007+106 44.43+- 0.08, 0.05 7.001
Q0026+129 44.30+- 0.03, 0.02 5.766
Q0049+171 43.60+- 0.04, 0.04 4.343
Q0050+124 44.62+- 0.04, 0.04 7.683
Q0052+251 44.78+- 0.09, 0.05 12.611
Q0054+144 44.71+- 0.04, 0.04 12.442
Q0121-590 44.90+- 0.04, 0.04 11.539
Q0134+329 45.44+- 0.04, 0.04 9.242
Q0205+024 44.19+- 0.04, 0.04 0.193
Q0312-770 44.60+- 0.30, 0.60 10.000
Q0637-752 44.60+- 0.30, 0.60 10.000
Q0804+761 44.60+- 0.30, 0.60 10.000
Q0837-120 44.60+- 0.30, 0.60 10.000
Q0844+349 44.60+- 0.25, 0.60 10.000
Q1028+313 44.60+- 0.30, 0.60 10.000
Q1100+772 44.49+- 0.03, 0.01 11.054
Q1116+215 44.74+- 0.04, 0.03 13.765
Q1137+660 44.60+- 0.30, 0.60 10.000
Q1146-037 44.60+- 0.25, 0.60 10.000
Q1202+281 44.71+- 0.03, 0.02 12.025
Q1211+143 43.39+- 0.00, 0.04 1.956
Q1219+755 44.60+- 0.11, 0.60 10.000
Q1226+023 44.79+- 0.03, 0.01 9.674
Q1307+085 44.60+- 0.30, 0.60 10.000
Q1352+183 44.21+- 0.04, 0.04 6.788
Q1407+265 44.60+- 0.30, 0.60 10.000
Q1416-129 44.60+- 0.15, 0.60 10.000
Q1426+015 44.60+- 0.30, 0.60 10.000
Q1501+106 44.09+- 0.04, 0.03 4.076
Q1545+210 44.90+- 0.04, 0.03 16.386
Q1613+658 44.89+- 0.04, 0.04 13.047
Q1704+608 44.60+- 0.03, 0.02 9.696
Q1721+343 44.60+- 0.30, 0.60 10.000
Q1803+676 43.38+- 0.04, 0.04 3.248
Q2130+099 44.42+- 0.04, 0.04 4.642
Q2135-147 44.89+- 0.04, 0.04 14.363

Objects with no spatial information (ref 0) have been assigned the median host galaxy luminosity of the remainder of the sample. References for host galaxy information:

(0) No data, median value assigned
(1) Boroson, Oke and Green (1982);
(2) Gehren et al (1984);
(3) Smith et al (1986);
(4) Boroson and Oke (1984);
%(5) Boroson, Persson and Oke (1985);
(5) McAlary et al (1983);
(6) Neugebauer et al (1985);
(7) Yee and Green (1987);
(8) Hutchings, Crampton and Campbell (1984);
(9) Griersmith and Visvanathan (1979).
(10) Hutchings, Johnson and Pike (1988);
(11) Hutchings, Janson and Neff (1989)
(12) Neizvestnii (1986);
(13) MacKenty (1990).